This is the raw output file without any devtooling support
#Charset codes webtools code#
You will see all generated code of a chunk in a single blob of code. The scale is different compared to the build performance, as one would expect rebuilds to be faster than builds.ĭoes it make sense to use this devtool for production builds? It's usually no when the devtool has a negative effect on user experience. How is the performance of the incremental build affected by the devtool setting? Slow devtools might reduce development feedback loop in watch mode. How is the performance of the initial build affected by the devtool setting? Possible choice when using SourceMap only for error reporting purposes. Possible choice when publishing a single file Recommended choice for production builds with high quality SourceMaps. Recommended choice for development builds with high quality SourceMaps. Recommended choice for development builds with maximum performance. Recommended choice for production builds with maximum performance.
The devtool option adds the plugin internally so you would end up with the plugin applied twice. Never use both the devtool option and plugin together. Instead of using the devtool option you can also use SourceMapDevToolPlugin/ EvalSourceMapDevToolPlugin directly as it has more options. Those examples will likely help you to understand the differences. The webpack repository contains an example showing the effect of all devtool variants. These values can affect build and rebuild speed dramatically.
devtoolĬhoose a style of source mapping to enhance the debugging process. See the source-map-loader to deal with existing source maps.
Use the SourceMapDevToolPlugin for a more fine grained configuration. This option controls if and how source maps are generated.
0 kommentar(er)
